Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg NYLJ Fortune 2023, CJR, NY Mag, AJE, Georgia, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Follow on X

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - 

Support this work by buying this book
Belt and Roadkill
and paperback

 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



In Corrupt UN of Guterres and de Croo UNDP Nepotism Complained of to Still Banned Press

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, March 27 –   How corrupt is today's UN system under Antonio Guterres and, at UNDP, Alexander de Croo? Today Inner City Press, banned from the UN by Guterres with none of its written questions answer by Spokespeople Stephane Dujarric and Melissa Fleming, returned to the UNDP beat with this, sent to it by whistleblowers:

Dear Matthew Russell Lee: At UNDP, the OHR Director is on annual leave until the end of April and will retire at the beginning of May 2026. The UNDP Chief of Staff, Michele Candotti, is also wrapping up and beginning his retirement, while still denying that 15 staff members inappropriately benefited from their expatriate status as internationally recruited staff.  We appealed to the UNDP Administrator, Alexander De Croo, to act on this long-standing corruption case.  We still have the record; all agencies and OIOS know this fraud.  But action was not taken because of these two senior managers’ intrusion. 

The new management needs to see this deception and take disciplinary measures to recover the taxpayers' money.  The investigation results and action were not shared with staff as promised by the Chief of Staff, and the update is to staff.  Nowadays, in UNDP, we are suffering due to relocation and optimization exercises.  We know the organization is facing a budget crisis.  Except for a few favored staff, we are not allowed to participate in the problem-solving efforts. Only a few have the right to create/amend new rules and to act erratically, destroying defenseless staff carriers.
   In yesterday’s UNDP BMS Optimization and Relocation Townhall, it was disgusting to see, as usual, Shazma Nathwani, one of the Double Dipper, lead the BMS Optimization recruitment.  Shazma’s presentation was full of bogus. She said that 60 vacancies were abolished and 58 created.  Out of 58, without clear guidance, she mentioned that 11 matched, and the remaining 47 were advertised.   It is not true because we only saw six advertisements.  

Nepotism filled the gap, and 47 vacancies were presented to Shazma’s networked staff.    In the meeting, they briefly showed each unit's Organogram, which they kept for a while.  The surprise is coming after done deal who got which position.   Shazma ended her presentation with loud, inexplicable laughter. It is not easy for most of the staff who are impacted one way or another, but for her, it is just another opportunity to dismay genuine staff who know there may be another promotion for her.  The BMS Director and other directors didn’t have the power to correct Shazma because they are already compromised in their honor.  Because the BMS didn’t act in accordance with UN80, there are still a lot of “D1 and D2” and “P5”  positions because Shazma was instrumental at the cost of others. 

 Staff were confused when Shazma introduced new arrangements for GS staff placement in Bonn and Madrid.  There was a question about why the newly created NPSA contract modality was excluded from this exercise, and her reply was nonsense: “They are not local.”    The GS staff from other countries are not local in Bonn and Madrid.  If that is the case, why did UNDP create IPSA and NPSA contract modalities outside ICSC guidelines?    But irregularities are common for Shazma’s unit, we started seeing retirees extending their G4 given for their job before retirement and getting a new IPSA contract.  Shazma’s new tactic is to circumvent the US immigration rules.

 Retires or other favorite staff after “DS” instead of returning their G4 visa, they take a break for two weeks and get another IPSA contract with the same G4 visa and PAD.  E.g., HQ/BMS/OSO, Planning Specialist.  Why do retirees get two-year contracts while the same unit has several staff positions abolished?  We know the retiree qualification is different from the new IPSA terms of reference, but it is just nepotism. 

  UNDP Administrator, Alexander De Croo - any answer? USUN PR Mike Waltz? MUNGA??  Watch this site.

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material / documents on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.
And/or join on Substack here, for Extra like on X for Subscribers

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com